Chuckecheeses has everything to do with it. It drives home the FACT that the world is dangerous, that parents should supervise their children more.
I believe as I read the ruling, yes, you might not be able to have minors unsupervised by their parent in the culinary tent. Depends on whether that is a youth activity. But even so, I believe children should be supervised by their parents, even under the culinary tent. And serving at a feast. I especially don't like to see children running loose and unsupervised at events (even though I have been guilty of the same thing at times).
No, background checks won't solve everything, but like I said in my previous post, it *might* scare off some perverts. In today's world you can't be too cautious. Background checks will not take the place of concientious parents. But it is a step in the right direction.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2008-01-28 05:52 pm (UTC)I believe as I read the ruling, yes, you might not be able to have minors unsupervised by their parent in the culinary tent. Depends on whether that is a youth activity. But even so, I believe children should be supervised by their parents, even under the culinary tent. And serving at a feast. I especially don't like to see children running loose and unsupervised at events (even though I have been guilty of the same thing at times).
No, background checks won't solve everything, but like I said in my previous post, it *might* scare off some perverts. In today's world you can't be too cautious. Background checks will not take the place of concientious parents. But it is a step in the right direction.